Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Past Issues
  • Videos
  • Submit an article
  • More
    • About the JOT
    • Editorial Board
  • IPR Logo
  • About Us
  • Journals
  • Publish
  • Advertise
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • More
    • Awards
    • Article Licensing
    • Academic Use
  • Follow PMR on LinkedIn
  • Follow PMR on Twitter

User menu

  • Sample our Content
  • Subscribe Now
  • Log in

Search

  • ADVANCED SEARCH: Discover more content by journal, author or time frame
The Journal of Trading
  • IPR Logo
  • About Us
  • Journals
  • Publish
  • Advertise
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • More
    • Awards
    • Article Licensing
    • Academic Use
  • Sample our Content
  • Subscribe Now
  • Log in
The Journal of Trading

The Journal of Trading

ADVANCED SEARCH: Discover more content by journal, author or time frame

  • Home
  • Past Issues
  • Videos
  • Submit an article
  • More
    • About the JOT
    • Editorial Board
  • Follow PMR on LinkedIn
  • Follow PMR on Twitter
Article

Student-Managed Portfolios: Wisdom of Independent Crowds?

Daniel Dorn
The Journal of Trading Winter 2018, 13 (1) 17-26; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3905/jot.2018.13.1.017
Daniel Dorn
is an associate professor of finance in the LeBow College of Business at Drexel University in Philadelphia, PA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF (Subscribers Only)
Loading

Click to login and read the full article.
Don’t have access? Sign up today to begin your trial to the PMR platform 

Abstract

This study uses a student-managed portfolio as a novel setting to examine the effect of crowd wisdom on investment decisions. Crowd wisdom is measured by peer voting at Drexel University’s Dragon Fund, where student managers vote to accept or reject each other’s recommendations. Based on a sample of 202 stock pitches between 2008 and 2016, the main finding is that accepted stocks significantly outperform rejected stocks. For example, accepted stocks returned 3.0% in excess of their corresponding sector benchmark during the 12 weeks following the recommendation, significantly higher than the negative 2.9% excess returns of rejected stocks. The results are robust to outliers and different evaluation horizons, are not due to size and book-to-market tilts, and cannot be explained by professional observers whose expertise might influence student votes.

  • © 2018 Pageant Media Ltd
View Full Text

Don’t have access? Register today to begin unrestricted access to our database of research.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?
PreviousNext
Back to top

Explore our content to discover more relevant research

  • By topic
  • Across journals
  • From the experts
  • Monthly highlights
  • Special collections

In this issue

The Journal of Trading: 13 (1)
The Journal of Trading
Vol. 13, Issue 1
Winter 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The Journal of Trading.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Student-Managed Portfolios: Wisdom of Independent Crowds?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The Journal of Trading
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The Journal of Trading web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Student-Managed Portfolios: Wisdom of Independent Crowds?
Daniel Dorn
The Journal of Trading Dec 2017, 13 (1) 17-26; DOI: 10.3905/jot.2018.13.1.017

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Save To My Folders
Share
Student-Managed Portfolios: Wisdom of Independent Crowds?
Daniel Dorn
The Journal of Trading Dec 2017, 13 (1) 17-26; DOI: 10.3905/jot.2018.13.1.017
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Tweet Widget Facebook Like LinkedIn logo

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • DESCRIPTION OF THE DATA
    • CROWD WISDOM AT WORK: ACCEPTED PITCHES OUTPERFORM REJECTED PITCHES
    • ALTERNATIVE EXPLANATION: STUDENTS PREFER RISKIER STOCKS?
    • ALTERNATIVE EXPLANATION: STUDENTS VOTE BASED ON PERFORMANCE SINCE RECOMMENDATION?
    • ALTERNATIVE EXPLANATION: STUDENT VOTES REFLECT PROFESSIONAL FEEDBACK?
    • ALTERNATIVE EXPLANATION: STUDENTS ACCEPT PITCHES BY GOOD STUDENTS?
    • CONCLUSION
    • ENDNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF (Subscribers Only)
  • PDF (Subscribers Only)

Similar Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • COMMENTARY: Space Unicorns and the Intermarket Trading System: Revisiting Myths
  • COMMENTARY: Commentary on “If Best Execution Is a Process, What Does That Process Look Like?”1
  • COMMENTARY: Beyond the Black Box Revisited: Algorithmic Trading and TCA Analysis Using Excel
Show more Article
LONDON
One London Wall, London, EC2Y 5EA
United Kingdom
+44 207 139 1600
 
NEW YORK
41 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10010
USA
+1 646 931 9045
pm-research@pageantmedia.com
 

Stay Connected

  • Follow PMR on LinkedIn
  • Follow PMR on Twitter

MORE FROM PMR

  • Home
  • Awards
  • Investment Guides
  • Videos
  • About PMR

INFORMATION FOR

  • Academics
  • Agents
  • Authors
  • Content Usage Terms

GET INVOLVED

  • Advertise
  • Publish
  • Article Licensing
  • Contact Us
  • Subscribe Now
  • Log In
  • Update your profile
  • Give us your feedback

© 2021 Pageant Media Ltd | All Rights Reserved | ISSN: 1559-3967 | E-ISSN: 2168-8427

  • Site Map
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies