Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Past Issues
  • Videos
  • Submit an article
  • More
    • About the JOT
    • Editorial Board
  • IPR Logo
  • About Us
  • Journals
  • Publish
  • Advertise
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • More
    • Awards
    • Article Licensing
    • Academic Use
  • Follow PMR on LinkedIn
  • Follow PMR on Twitter

User menu

  • Sample our Content
  • Request a Demo
  • Log in

Search

  • ADVANCED SEARCH: Discover more content by journal, author or time frame
The Journal of Trading
  • IPR Logo
  • About Us
  • Journals
  • Publish
  • Advertise
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • More
    • Awards
    • Article Licensing
    • Academic Use
  • Sample our Content
  • Request a Demo
  • Log in
The Journal of Trading

The Journal of Trading

ADVANCED SEARCH: Discover more content by journal, author or time frame

  • Home
  • Past Issues
  • Videos
  • Submit an article
  • More
    • About the JOT
    • Editorial Board
  • Follow PMR on LinkedIn
  • Follow PMR on Twitter
Article

Order Handling of Institutional Investors

Peter Gomber, Bartholomäus Ende and Markus Gsell
The Journal of Trading Fall 2009, 4 (4) 10-31; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3905/JOT.2009.4.4.010
Peter Gomber
is a professor of e-Finance and a member of the board of the E-Finance Lab at Goethe University in Frankfurt, Germany.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: gomber@wiwi.uni-frankfurt.de
Bartholomäus Ende
is a research assistant at the E-Finance Lab at Goethe University in Frankfurt, Germany.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: ende@wiwi.uni-frankfurt.de
Markus Gsell
is a research assistant at the Chair of e-Finance at Goethe University in Frankfurt, Germany.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: gsell@wiwi.uni-frankfurt.de
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF (Subscribers Only)
Loading

Click to login and read the full article.

Don’t have access? Click here to request a demo 
Alternatively, Call a member of the team to discuss membership options
US and Overseas: +1 646-931-9045
UK: 0207 139 1600

Abstract

This study reflects the assessment of the largest European buyside companies concerning new order execution opportunities like Direct Market Access, Smart Order Routing or Algorithmic Trading. The focus of the survey is on self-directed trading based on these new technology driven execution opportunities (here defined as non-delegated order handling). This differs from the traditional way of order handling where execution responsibility is delegated to brokers. Altogether, the respondents largely support the concept of non-delegated order handling: They assess it to be compatible with their requirements concerning order sizes, anonymity as well as urgency. Also they perceive it to be flexible for variations in these demands. Finally, they believe this concept increases their trading control. As the main driver, the innovations’ fit for institutional trading tasks–determined mainly by the ability to provide trading control, anonymity and to satisfy varying urgency demands–was identified. Beside the fact that this fit directly affects the actual usage of non-delegated order handling, it also significantly affects performance expectations that prove to be the second strongest driver of the concept’s adoption. Further, it turns out that competition exhibits a rather weak effect. As an inhibitor for non-delegated order handling, contractual barriers could be identified. Contractual barriers are the financial attractiveness of broker contracts as well as valuable services concerning provided infrastructure and research that might be missed when deciding to use non-delegated order handling.

  • © 2009 Pageant Media Ltd
View Full Text

Don’t have access? Click here to request a demo

Alternatively, Call a member of the team to discuss membership options

US and Overseas: +1 646-931-9045

UK: 0207 139 1600

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?
PreviousNext
Back to top

Explore our content to discover more relevant research

  • By topic
  • Across journals
  • From the experts
  • Monthly highlights
  • Special collections

In this issue

The Journal of Trading: 4 (4)
The Journal of Trading
Vol. 4, Issue 4
Fall 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The Journal of Trading.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Order Handling of Institutional Investors
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The Journal of Trading
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The Journal of Trading web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Order Handling of Institutional Investors
Peter Gomber, Bartholomäus Ende, Markus Gsell
The Journal of Trading Sep 2009, 4 (4) 10-31; DOI: 10.3905/JOT.2009.4.4.010

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Save To My Folders
Share
Order Handling of Institutional Investors
Peter Gomber, Bartholomäus Ende, Markus Gsell
The Journal of Trading Sep 2009, 4 (4) 10-31; DOI: 10.3905/JOT.2009.4.4.010
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Tweet Widget Facebook Like LinkedIn logo

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS
    • RESULTS OBTAINED
    • DESCRIPTION OF THE PARTIAL LEAST SQUARE MODEL RESULTS
    • CONCLUSION
    • ENDNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF (Subscribers Only)
  • PDF (Subscribers Only)

Similar Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • COMMENTARY: Space Unicorns and the Intermarket Trading System: Revisiting Myths
  • COMMENTARY: Commentary on “If Best Execution Is a Process, What Does That Process Look Like?”1
  • COMMENTARY: Beyond the Black Box Revisited: Algorithmic Trading and TCA Analysis Using Excel
Show more Article
LONDON
One London Wall, London, EC2Y 5EA
United Kingdom
+44 207 139 1600
 
NEW YORK
41 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10010
USA
+1 646 931 9045
pm-research@pageantmedia.com
 

Stay Connected

  • Follow PMR on LinkedIn
  • Follow PMR on Twitter

MORE FROM PMR

  • Home
  • Awards
  • Investment Guides
  • Videos
  • About PMR

INFORMATION FOR

  • Academics
  • Agents
  • Authors
  • Content Usage Terms

GET INVOLVED

  • Advertise
  • Publish
  • Article Licensing
  • Contact Us
  • Subscribe Now
  • Log In
  • Update your profile
  • Give us your feedback

© 2021 Pageant Media Ltd | All Rights Reserved | ISSN: 1559-3967 | E-ISSN: 2168-8427

  • Site Map
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies